Barney Frank tells the truth, sort of

Posted in The Pursuit of Control on October 27th, 2009 by pr

It isn’t often that Barney Frank tells the truth as plainly as he did on The Ed Show yesterday, though he never fails to surround himself with lies, and this quote is no different:

The right wing took control of government and ruined it, they gave it a bad reputation. Now that we are trying on every front to increase the role of government in the regulatory area, we run into this public opinion that says ‘hey those are the guys that screwed up Katrina…’

So in Frank’s attempt to explain why more and more people don’t want the federal government taking over our private businesses, running the healthcare industry and meddling in our lives far more than they should, he blames the public’s skepticism on how Katrina was handled? Maybe someone should tell Barney that it has very little to do with Katrina and everything to do with out of control spending, bloated government budgets, the utter failure of every government entitlement program and the simple fact that no one trusts Congress to do anything in the interest of the people anymore.

You have to at least respect that Frank told us the truth about the government’s power grab, just like he told us his opinion on single payer, which is more than you can say for the President. Wait, the president wants single payer too?!

Tags: , , , , ,

Peace Prize Winner… Declares War?

Posted in The Pursuit of Control on October 22nd, 2009 by pr

Isn’t there something ironic about the latest Nobel Peace Prize Laureate declaring war on… Fox News?

This started long ago but when President Obama’s thugs all came out and accused Fox News of not being a news organization it became clear that we aren’t dealing with your average Chicago politician, this guy is much worse.  As Michael Calderon over at Politico points out, way back in June President Obama complained to John Harwood of CNBC about the “…television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration…”.

President Obama is the most divisive, partisan politician to ever live in the White House and his closest advisors and cabinet members including Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, and Anita Dunn have all tried to marginalize Fox News by labeling them as a wing of the GOP.

Are they the only ones that can’t see what they are doing to themselves? Attacking a giant like Fox News, who has more viewers than many of the other ‘news’ channels combined, can’t be good for business. Besides, I thought we were beyond partisanship, I thought Barack Obama was the great moderate that would cross the aisle.

Our president is encouraging violence by prolonging his decision to send more troops to Afghanistan, lying to the American public about his healthcare takeover plans and waging a war on Fox News.

How Nobel of him.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

The Congressional reform plan, 2009

Posted in The Pursuit of Control on October 16th, 2009 by pr

Bailouts, take overs, health care reform, instead of allowing Congress to continue to do whatever they want with the goal of getting it all done before they have to start campaigning for the 2010 elections, lets be very clear on our new set of expectations. We can call it a taxpayer bailout or a congressional reform plan. Whatever we call it, we need to remind the people in Washington who their bosses are. I’ve got a few reform ideas to begin with, but I’m open to adding more, let me know what you think.

1. Read the bill and allow the public the opportunity to read the bill.

This seems simple enough, and it would solve several problems. Our representatives in congress, according to John Conyers, aren’t intelligent enough to read the bills the way they are written now, so making this a rule might force them to shorten the bills and stop filling them with legalize and double-talk that can be interpreted to fit the needs of the bill’s sponsors while allowing them to say something different. On a side note, this would have prevented the Joe Wilson incident as well. It would also give the public the opportunity to read the bill and tell their representatives what they think about it, which is exactly what the representatives are trying to avoid, but remember, we run the show, not them.

2. One issue, one bill.

HR3221 is the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009. This bill invests a bunch of money in college grants and gives a couple billion dollars to promote segregation (it gives money to black colleges and universities and minority serving universities), but the bill also cuts off funding to ACORN… huh? I understand it is faster to add it in as an amendment to an existing bill, but what if a representative wants to vote for one, but not the other. OOOHHHHH, it was intended to be like that, I get it. One bill, one issue. Writing a bill cutting off ACORN funding wouldn’t take long, just write a new bill, allow the public time to comment, and vote based on the opinions of your constituents, sounds simple enough.

3. Speak when spoken to.

Did anyone catch Sheila Jackson Lee spending taxpayer dollars to lobby against Rush Limbaugh in his efforts to become a minority owner in an NFL franchise? Don’t do this crap. You are a Representative in the United States Congress, elected by the people to perform the duties of the public. Using the floor of the House of Representatives to blatantly attack a private citizen because you do not agree with his political views is grossly negligent and there should be no place for this in our country. You are a public representative shaping the laws of our country, you are not a private citizen. If you would like to speak your mind do it on your time outside of the House.

Elaborating on the last point there, I think this is becoming a bigger and bigger issue amongst our elected officials in this country. I understand that a certain amount of ego is involved when running for any political position in most cases, but these politicians are ‘hired’ by taxpayers to do a very specific job. We have allowed them to make a mockery of the halls of Congress and take on issues that they have no business addressing. The truth is, as congress men and women, you are subject to public scrutiny, that is your job. You, though, have a moral obligation to represent the people of the country to the best of your and have no right to use the publicity available to you to attack private citizens or get involved in issues beyond the scope of your work. If you want to address those individuals and issues, you have every right to do so outside of the halls of Congress, but you should still refrain.

Today becoming elected to congress is a great stepping stone towards wealth and notoriety. It wasn’t intended to be this way. Our founders intentions were to fill Congress with those willing to make a sacrifice for the greater good. Our congress men and women were to be moral and just. They were not intended to be rewarded financially for their service, instead they were to serve to better our country. George Washington nearly went broke while serving his country, but he served with honor.

Congress, be honorable, act as though you are adults, representing the people of the greatest country our world has ever witnessed.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Democrapublican Party

Posted in The Pursuit of Control on October 15th, 2009 by pr

Please, stop the madness.

I propose some of the ‘moderate’ Republicans in the House and Senate do everyone a favor and either pull a Specter and join the Democrat party or create your own party. If you choose the latter, let me be the first to suggest a new name, the Democrapublican party. It has a ring to it, doesn’t it?! Just like my suggested founders, this new name is filled with crap.

Let’s get to those founders. Might I propose that the first members of the Democrapublican party include Olympia Snowe, Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins.  Calling yourselves Republicans is ridiculous. Stop hiding behind bipartisanship when what you’re voting on is in no sense a moderate issue. Olympia and Susan, this health care takeover is simply a entitlement program aimed at making more and more people dependent on the government and redistributing wealth. Run the other way. Voting for a plan that looks anything like the bill being proposed by Max Baucus is Republican suicide… but maybe that’s what you want. Lindsey, cap and tax? Seriously?! Amnesty? Go away. The democrapublicans would love you.

In fact, if I hear another person say ‘I’m a conservative, but I voted for Obama’ I’m going to tell they them to join the Democrapublican party as well. Statements like this are ludicrous. Does anyone think before they speak? Obama is the most liberal politician to ever call the white house home and you’re saying that you’re a conservative, but you think voting for hope and change is better than ANY alternative?? Ignorance is bliss I suppose.

If these people are Republicans, then I am definitely not.

Tags: , , , , , , ,