Today if you believe we should protect our borders and enforce immigration laws you are labeled a racist and deemed to be heartless. The media finds the most heart-wrenching story they can involving a family that came into the United States illegally, completely ignoring that unsecured borders threaten the security of the citizens of United States and illegal immigration is a devastating drain on the economy.

If you question the progressive agenda of entitlements and redistribution of wealth you are selfish, unfair and probably, again, racist. If you don’t want big government taking over the healthcare in the United States you are, in effect, killing the uninsured. You’re labeled an extremist, a conspiracy theorist and ignorant if you think the government handling our healthcare is, at best, overstepping their bounds, and, at worst, acting unconstitutionally. Forget the fact that entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security have nearly $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, this program will be different they say.

If you choose to watch certain television stations that don’t chant the big government mantra you’re a tea bagger, closed-minded, a hate-monger, and, you guessed it, a racist.

If you believe life begins at conception then all of a sudden you are infringing on a woman’s freedoms. Isn’t that ironic. If you believe marriage is a sacred bond between one man and one woman, blessed by God, you’re mean-spirited and out of touch.

In today’s society moderate is the word of choice. You’re led to believe that the only Republican that can win an election is one in name only. One that walks the line of indecision, a place more closely associated with the self-preservation of the politician than with the values and principles of the Conservative.

If Conservatives continue to stand pat and allow the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and even Barack Obama to blame every day issues on race, religion, social class, gender or sexual orientation, Conservatism will continue to suffer. Until, as a whole, we begin to stand for independence, self-reliance, responsibility and hard work, Conservatism will suffer. True equality is not caring what color the skin of a person is. Real justice is living our lives free of the fears of being labeled a racist or a bigot because we reject the notion that anyone is owed anything more than life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Conservatism isn’t about hate. Conservatism isn’t about racism, slavery or bigotry. Conservatism is about the love of God, family and freedom, and if that isn’t politically correct, I don’t know what is.

This started long ago but when President Obama’s thugs all came out and accused Fox News of not being a news organization it became clear that we aren’t dealing with your average Chicago politician, this guy is much worse.  As Michael Calderon over at Politico points out, way back in June President Obama complained to John Harwood of CNBC about the “…television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration…”.

President Obama is the most divisive, partisan politician to ever live in the White House and his closest advisors and cabinet members including Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, and Anita Dunn have all tried to marginalize Fox News by labeling them as a wing of the GOP.

Are they the only ones that can’t see what they are doing to themselves? Attacking a giant like Fox News, who has more viewers than many of the other ‘news’ channels combined, can’t be good for business. Besides, I thought we were beyond partisanship, I thought Barack Obama was the great moderate that would cross the aisle.

Our president is encouraging violence by prolonging his decision to send more troops to Afghanistan, lying to the American public about his healthcare takeover plans and waging a war on Fox News.

How Nobel of him.

1. Read the bill and allow the public the opportunity to read the bill.

This seems simple enough, and it would solve several problems. Our representatives in congress, according to John Conyers, aren’t intelligent enough to read the bills the way they are written now, so making this a rule might force them to shorten the bills and stop filling them with legalize and double-talk that can be interpreted to fit the needs of the bill’s sponsors while allowing them to say something different. On a side note, this would have prevented the Joe Wilson incident as well. It would also give the public the opportunity to read the bill and tell their representatives what they think about it, which is exactly what the representatives are trying to avoid, but remember, we run the show, not them.

2. One issue, one bill.

HR3221 is the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009. This bill invests a bunch of money in college grants and gives a couple billion dollars to promote segregation (it gives money to black colleges and universities and minority serving universities), but the bill also cuts off funding to ACORN… huh? I understand it is faster to add it in as an amendment to an existing bill, but what if a representative wants to vote for one, but not the other. OOOHHHHH, it was intended to be like that, I get it. One bill, one issue. Writing a bill cutting off ACORN funding wouldn’t take long, just write a new bill, allow the public time to comment, and vote based on the opinions of your constituents, sounds simple enough.

3. Speak when spoken to.

Did anyone catch Sheila Jackson Lee spending taxpayer dollars to lobby against Rush Limbaugh in his efforts to become a minority owner in an NFL franchise? Don’t do this crap. You are a Representative in the United States Congress, elected by the people to perform the duties of the public. Using the floor of the House of Representatives to blatantly attack a private citizen because you do not agree with his political views is grossly negligent and there should be no place for this in our country. You are a public representative shaping the laws of our country, you are not a private citizen. If you would like to speak your mind do it on your time outside of the House.

Elaborating on the last point there, I think this is becoming a bigger and bigger issue amongst our elected officials in this country. I understand that a certain amount of ego is involved when running for any political position in most cases, but these politicians are ‘hired’ by taxpayers to do a very specific job. We have allowed them to make a mockery of the halls of Congress and take on issues that they have no business addressing. The truth is, as congress men and women, you are subject to public scrutiny, that is your job. You, though, have a moral obligation to represent the people of the country to the best of your and have no right to use the publicity available to you to attack private citizens or get involved in issues beyond the scope of your work. If you want to address those individuals and issues, you have every right to do so outside of the halls of Congress, but you should still refrain.

Today becoming elected to congress is a great stepping stone towards wealth and notoriety. It wasn’t intended to be this way. Our founders intentions were to fill Congress with those willing to make a sacrifice for the greater good. Our congress men and women were to be moral and just. They were not intended to be rewarded financially for their service, instead they were to serve to better our country. George Washington nearly went broke while serving his country, but he served with honor.

Congress, be honorable, act as though you are adults, representing the people of the greatest country our world has ever witnessed.

I propose some of the ‘moderate’ Republicans in the House and Senate do everyone a favor and either pull a Specter and join the Democrat party or create your own party. If you choose the latter, let me be the first to suggest a new name, the Democrapublican party. It has a ring to it, doesn’t it?! Just like my suggested founders, this new name is filled with crap.

Let’s get to those founders. Might I propose that the first members of the Democrapublican party include Olympia Snowe, Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins.  Calling yourselves Republicans is ridiculous. Stop hiding behind bipartisanship when what you’re voting on is in no sense a moderate issue. Olympia and Susan, this health care takeover is simply a entitlement program aimed at making more and more people dependent on the government and redistributing wealth. Run the other way. Voting for a plan that looks anything like the bill being proposed by Max Baucus is Republican suicide… but maybe that’s what you want. Lindsey, cap and tax? Seriously?! Amnesty? Go away. The democrapublicans would love you.

In fact, if I hear another person say ‘I’m a conservative, but I voted for Obama’ I’m going to tell they them to join the Democrapublican party as well. Statements like this are ludicrous. Does anyone think before they speak? Obama is the most liberal politician to ever call the white house home and you’re saying that you’re a conservative, but you think voting for hope and change is better than ANY alternative?? Ignorance is bliss I suppose.

If these people are Republicans, then I am definitely not.

Should President Obama ask for Anita’s resignation. Of course he should. Not just because she is incompetent and obviously not interested in bipartisan politics, but because every time someone from the White House speaks it tells us a little bit more about the sniveling, egotistical, insecure baby living in the White House.

I think we should have an open house at the White House. Kind of like media day at the super bowl. Have all of Obama’s ’special advisors’, cabinet appointees and the rest of his staff (even the one that had to clean up the dog’s mess on Air Force One) come out to the White House lawn and answer questions that the American people have. No scripts, no Robert Gibbs or Anita Dunn, just real responses from all of Obama’s gang.

The more people we hear from, the more Americans will see the character of those running this country. The more Anita’s we hear from, the better off we’ll be in the long run.

President Obama, Anita should be done.

I guess I never realized how ridiculous the Nobel Peace Prize really was until I woke up this morning listening to Obama accept the award. In typical Obama fashion though, the first thing Obama did was credit foreign leaders for his award. I guess when you really have absolutely zero reasons to win the award you have to dig pretty deep to figure out why you should be waking up to this prize.

Even past presidents who have won the awards while in office had actual reasons to be granted the prize. Both Roosevelt and Wilson were awarded the prize for treaties signed under their watch. In the last several years though the prize has fallen off of a cliff and has been awarded to Carter in 2002, Gore in 2007 and now Obama in 2009.

Since the prize is awarded for accomplishments over the last year  maybe Obama’s speech in Germany was enough to land the prize. Maybe denouncing Jeremiah Wright was enough to push him over the edge and win the award. I know, maybe adopting the family dog was enough of a peaceful gesture to grant him the honor.

If they really wanted to grant the award to a liberal why not President Clinton? His charity has raised over $1 billion towards humanitarian causes all over the world. Gandhi never even won the award!

Some are saying this was merely a stunt to take a swipe at the Bush administration. If that is the case we are in much worse shape than I thought. To grant an undeserving rookie president who has managed to do nothing to help the economy, improve the lives of citizens of the United States, or the world for that matter with zero tangible achievements is not only obviously biased, but is also absolutely ridiculous and points to the mindset of those around the world that value the weak, conformist agenda of the Obama administration.

I guess the only other question would be how is Obama going to redistribute his prize money?

Is this really surprising? Has Nancy Pelosi ever met a tax she didn’t like? No. This is expected, what made this a true Nancy Pelosi moment was her rationalization for the VAT.

Nancy said companies that import cars are at an advantage because they don’t have the burden of healthcare and pension costs built into their vehicles, their respective VAT’s pay for those things for them.

Nancy’s argument only comes close to making sense if all of the auto workers in the US were moved to some sort of public option and their pensions were entirely government funded, so what is Nancy really saying?

This doesn’t have anything to do with a VAT. This has everything to do with bloated, out of control union deals that drive up the cost of vehicles. The argument for a VAT is simply ridiculous and will end up driving up costs on everything from a new car to a gallon of milk. It’s irresponsible and ignorant to say that a VAT would make our auto industry more competitive and would in some way be better for the American people.

This is just a backwards way of taxing the American people while being able to not calling it a tax on the middle-class. Instead it would simply drive up the cost of goods and services and wouldn’t ever show up on your sales receipt.

No wonder congressional approval is plummeting!

Pelosi makes some other interesting comments in the entirely too long interview, if you’re looking for a headache watch this:

http://charlierose.http.internapcdn.net/charlierose/100509LOW.wmv

The Declaration of Independence declares life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness inalienable rights of man, granted not by the government, but by our creator.

Today our government is trying to redefine those rights. Their desperate and shameless pursuit of control is destroying the United States of America that our founding fathers worked so hard to create.

The endless parade of new spending does nothing but create a population dependent on the state. Teaching a man to pursue happiness will go much further than providing happiness in the form of government entitlements.

Lets stand up. Voice your opinion, let your politicians know how you feel. Find common ground with your neighbors, friends and co-workers and work together towards a common goal of returning our country to a government that is by the people and for the people.

Should we fail to protect our rights our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness will be overtaken by lies, lawmakers and the pursuit of control.